Chapter 9: Inheritance
-
Introduction
-
Who
are eligible as heirs and what share is due to each?
-
If
a person who has a father passes away leaving children. Does the death of
the children father deprive those young children of the inheritance which
their father would have received, had his father died before him?
-
Can
one dispute inheritance on the basis of local laws and traditions, which
differ from Allah's law?
-
If
a man gifts to any of his children or to his wife, does it effect their
share of inheritance when he dies?
-
Who
are unlawful co-sharers of inheritance?
-
Is
it allowed for one to disinherit one's legal heirs?
INHERITANCE
"It
is prescribed, when death approaches any of you, if he leaves any goods, that he
make a bequest to parents and next of kin, according to reasonable usage; this
is due from the God fearing". "If anyone changes the bequest after
hearing it, the guilt shall be on those who make the change. For God hears and
knows (all things)". (II : 180-181)
Inheritance
is that property and wealth which falls to the lot of the heirs of a deceased
person. It plays an important role in the distribution of wealth, because
inequitable provisions of inheritance brings about inequality in the society and
widens the gulf between the high and the low or the rich and the poor. According
to the Islamic law of inheritance the wealth should be kept in circulation as
far as possible and not be monopolize by a few individuals.
The
basic or fundamental principles of the Islamic law of inheritance are few and
very simple. They are:
a)
That so long as a Muslim is alive he has an absolute right of disposing
of, or gifting away, his property in any way he likes, but on his death he is
entitled to will away to the extent only of one-third of what remains of his
property after his funeral expenses are paid and his debts are liquidated.
(The debts include the wife's dowry or "MEHR").
b)
That a male gets one portion equal to twice that of the female, and
c)
That the residue, after the claims of all the egatees are satisfied, goes
to the public treasury or "BAIT-UL-MAL" for public purposes such as
the maintenance of Muslim widows and orphans and the like. With regard to (a) it
may be mentioned here that there is no such thing as a vested interest in the
Islamic law of inheritance merely on the grounds of birth. If one of the
prospective heirs dies during the life of the testator, his interest in the
testators estate dies with him. For instance, if one of the sons of the testator
dies during his lifetime the interest of such predeceased for in his father's
estate dies with him. The son's surviving child or children, if any, gets
nothing. In such a contingency a Muslim can, under the authority vested in him
in (a) above, make suitable provisions during his lifetime for such of his
survivors as may have suffered simply because of an accident. Failing that he
may provide for them out of the one-third of his property, up to which he is
entitled to give away on his death-bed.
It
may be mentioned that originally these bequests were meant to be given for pious
uses only, but a Muslim may divert his bequest to any other use he likes,
provided it is not to the prejudice of his heirs. Their consent to be bequest is
therefore necessary.
This
check has been provided for so that the testator may not be unduly partial to
any of his heirs in preference to others.
With
regard to (b) which entitles a male to a portion of two females, it may be
mentioned that in pre-islamic times not only women but even children were
debared from inheriting anything on the ground they only should inherit who were
able to war. Islam, however, abolished this inequitable custom and gave women
and children their due share in the property of their kindred, but not without
the proviso that men (who fought for the defense of their religion and their
country) should get twice as much as women. Man's superiority over women has in
this respect, been recognized. (IV : 34). Otherwise the Qur'an gives women the
same rights over men as men have rights over women (II : 228).
With
respect to (c) above which made the Bait-ul-Mal or the public treasury as the
resiliency legatee of the estate which remains unclaimed, it may be mentions
that it was after all the public money which went to the Public Treasury for the
food of the public. We may today boast of our orphanages and widows homes, but
Islam provided for them fourteen hundred years ago.
Irrespective
of this the Qur'an enjoins that if the poor and the orphans as also the kin, to
whom nothing is due, be present, in the hope of getting something, when the
property of a deceased Muslim is being distributed, they should be given
something or spoken to kindly, if they are dissatisfied. (IV : 8).
back to top
Question:
Who
are eligible as heirs and what share is due to each?
Answer:
Before
one goes into the question of inheritance, which has been detailed in the
Qur'an, The situation as it existed prior to Islam will be explained.
In
the days of ignorance, in pre-islamic Arabia no share of inheritance was given
to females, and little if any, was given to young boys. The reason was that
neither group could fight against any aggressor. Allah's law, on the other hand,
has made inheritance due to all kinfolk, according to their degree of kinship
and their shares which will be detailed later. It is the view of Islam that
members of the same family should help and look after one another. Everyone is
required to look after his relatives when they are in need and share his
relatives liability in paying compensation in case of inflicting death or bodily
harm in others. Hence, it was only right that he should inherit him, if he
leaves some money or property behind, according to his degree of kinship This
gives practical effect to the rule which states "Gain is commensurate with
liability". Islam is a complete and perfectly coherent system. This quality
of the Islamic system appears most vividly in the distribution of rights and
obligations.
For
all these practical and natural aspects of human life, and for many other social
interests. Allahhas laid down the general rule of inheritance:
"From
what is left by parents and those nearest related there is a share for men and a
share for women, whether the property be small or large - a determinate
share". (IV : 7) This is the general principle by which Islam gave women,
fourteen centuries ago, the same right is men to have a share f inheritance and
by which it has preserved the rights of youngsters, who were treated unfairly in
the days of ignorance. The society of ignorance looked at individuals according
to their value in war and productivity. Islam, which is a divine method, looks
first at the human value of man. This is his ..... value
of which he cannot be deprived. His duties and obligations within the family and
the community takes a secondary position.
The
laws of inheritance has been decreed by almighty Allah in Sura An Nisa (IV : 7
to 12). The Sura IV : II explains the Islamic system of inheritance. It starts
with an order, made in the form of a strong recommendation made by Allah to
parents, to maintain justice among their children; The Surah states:
"God
(thus) directs you as regards your children's inheritance; to the male a portion
equal to that of two females; if only daughters two or more; their share is
two-thirds of the inheritance. If only one, her share is a half". (IV : II)
This
order shows that Allah limitless, He is in His glory is kinder, fairer and more
merciful than parents are to their own children. It also shows that the whole
system of inheritance has been laid down by Allah who has given His verdict in
every issue which concerns parents and children, or may come up among relatives.
People have no choice but to receive their orders from Him and to implement His
rulings. This is the proper concept of faith and religion which the Surah, in
its entirety, seeks to explain in the clearest of terms.
The
opening statement also lays down the general principles which pervades the whole
system of Islamic inheritance. Details are then provided and shares assigned in
the light of the aforementioned general principle. All these details are given
in two verses, the first is devoted to inheritance by offspring and by parents
from their children, while the second is devoted to the explanation of
inheritance of husbands and wives, and in cases when the deceased has no
surviving children or parents. A few other rules of inheritance are also
explained in the last verse of this Surah.
These
three verses provide the foundation of the Islamic system of inheritance, which
constitutes a branch of Islamic jurisprudence known as that of "decreed
shares". Further elaborations are stated clearly in a number of Hadiths,
while certain others have been deduced by scholars on the basis of the principle
provided in this verses.
Inheritance
of parents and children.
"God
(thus) directs you as regards your children's (inheritance) to the male a
portion equal to that of two-females; If only daughters, two or more, their
share is two thirds of the inheritance; If only one, her share is a half".
"For
parents a sixth share of the inheritance to each, if the deceased left children;
if no children, and the parents are the (only) heirs, the mother has a third, if
the deceased left brothers (or sisters) the mother has a sixth (the distribution
in all cases after the payment of legacies and debts.
Ye
know not whether your parents or your children are nearest to you in benefit.
These are settled portions ordained by God; and God is All-knowing,
All-Wise". (IV:II).
In
our last article we discussed the first time in this verse which states a
general principle in the Islamic system of inheritance which gives the male a
share equal to that of two females. The division of inheritance begins with the
shares of offsprings when they inherit their parents. If the deceased has no
male issue, but has two daughters or more, his daughters share out equally
two-thirds of his estate. If he has left behind only one daughter, she inherits
half of what he has left. The remainder goes to the nearest of kin on his
father's side i.e. to his father, or grandfather, or his brother, or his half
brother on his father's side or to his parental uncle or the children of his
grandfather.
The
Quranic verse states
"If
only daughters, two or more, their share is two-thirds of the inheritance".
Having
completed the share of offspring, the verse goes to explain the shares given to
the parents when they survive any of their children in all cases whether the
deceased has children or not.
There
are then, different cases and different shares of parents according to
particular situations. The first is that when the deceased leaves behind
children of his own in addition to his parents. In this case, each of his
parents inherits one-sixth and the remainder goes to his son, or his sons and
daughter or daughters, on the basis of a son having a share equal to that of two
daughters. If the deceased has only one daughter, she inherits one-half of her
father's estate, while each of his parents takes one-sixth and the father takes
last one-sixth on the basis of his being the nearest of kin to the deceased. In
other words, the father has one portion as an ordained share and another portion
for being the nearest of kin taking what remains after those who are given
appointed shares have taken theirs. If the deceased has two daughters or more,
they take two-thirds and each of his parents takes one-sixth.
The
second situation is that when the deceased has neither children, brothers
sisters nor spouse. His parents then are his only heirs. In this case the mother
inherits one-third as her appointed share, and the reminder goes to his father
as his nearest of kin. The father's share in this case is double that of the
mother. If the deceased leaves a spouse in addition to his parents, the husband
takes one half in the case of the deceased being a woman, and the wife takes
one- third if the deceased is a man. The mother takes one third (and here there
is a difference among scholars as to whether the mother's share is one-third of
the whole estate or one- third of what is left after the deceased's wife or
husband has taken their share) and the father takes what is left after the
mother has taken her share, provided that the father's share is not less than
the mother's.
The
third situation is that when the deceased is survived by his parents and
brothers whether they are full or half brothers on either the father's or
mother's side, they do not inherit any share themselves because their father
takes precedence over them and he is the nearest of kin to the deceased after
own son. Brother's however, reduce the mother's share by half, from one-third to
one-sixth. The father takes the remainder if the deceased has no surviving
spouse. If there is only one brother of the deceased alongwith his parents, he
does not reduce the mother's share. She receives one-third in the same way as if
there were no children or brothers of the deceased.
All
these shares, however, are apportioned after the execution of the deceased's
will and payment of his outstanding debts.
The
will takes precedence over the apportioned shares of inheritance because it
represents the deceased's desire. In fact, provision for making a will has been
made so that care can be taken of certain cases where some relatives take
precedence over others and "screen" (to use the Islamic term) them
from inheritance. Those who are screened may be poor and in need of help. Making
a will in their favor is one way of helping them. There are other case where the
interests of the family are served through cementing relations between the heirs
of the deceased and relatives who are not entitled to any share of his
inheritance. Bequeathing some money to them by will is certain to remove all
cases of enemy, grudge and conflict before they take
oots. We have to remember here that no heir may be given by will anything
over his or her apportioned share and that there is a ceiling for what any
person may bequeath by will. That ceiling is one-third of the whole estate.
Limiting the will in this way is guarantee against any prejudice to the rights
of the heirs.
Inheritance
of husbands, wives, brothers and sisters.
"In
what your wives leave, your share is a half, if they leave no child, but if they
leave a child, ye get a fourth, after payment of legacies and debts. In what ye
leave their share is a fourth, if ye leave no child, but if ye leave a child,
they get an eight, after payment of legacies and debts.
If
the man and woman whose inheritance is in question has left neither ascendants
or descendants, but has left a brother or a sister, each one of the two gets a
sixth; but if more than two, they share in a third; after payment of legacies
and debts; So that no loss is caused (to any one). Thus is it ordained by God;
and God is All-Knowing, Most forgiving". (IV : 12)
In
the last part of the verse (IV : I) it concludes :
"Ye
know not whether your parents or your children are nearest to you in benefit.
These are settled portions ordained by God; and God is All-Knowing,
All-Wise". (IV : II)
This
comment provides three torches with varying aims. The first touch is meant to
help people accept these appointed shared willingly. Some people may be
motivated by their parental instinct to favor their own-children over their
parents if division of their estate is left entirely to them. This is
understandable because there is a natural weakness by a hypersensitive moral
feeling towards their parents.
Others
***** between their natural weaknesses and moral feelings. It may happen that
the social environment and traditions impose certain considerations similar to
those which were voiced by some people when the legislation if inheritance was
first revealed. Allah therefore, wants to give all people the reassurance
generated by admission to His will and to His legislation by reminding them that
His knowledge is perfect, absolute, while people do not know who of their
relatives is more benefit to them and which method of sharing out inheritance
may serve, their interests best.
The
second touch states the principles on which the whole system is based. It is not
a question of favoring one person over another or serving a narrow interest. It
is all a question of faith and divine law. "These comments are made before
the legislation of inheritance is completed so that the whole matter is put in
the proper perspective of faith which defines religion as submission to Allah's
law and accepting His rulings. The Surah goes into defense other apportioned
shares:
"In
what your wives leave, your share is a half, If they leave no child; but if they
leave a child, ye get a fourth; after payment of legacies and debts. In what you
leave their share is a fourth, if ye leave no child; but if ye leave a child,
they get an eighth; after payment of legacies and debts". (IV : 12)
These
statements are clear and elaborate. A husband inherits half of his deceased
wife's property if she leaves behind no son or daughter, her husband inherits
one quarter of her property. The children of her children i.e. the grand-
children reduce the husbands share from one-half to one- quarter in the same way
as her own children. The same applies to her children from an earlier marriage
who also reduce her husband's share to one quarter. Her property is divided
among her heirs after settling any outstanding debts or executing her will, as
mentioned earlier. A wife inherits one quarter of the property left behind by
her husband, if he leaves behind no children. If he has a child, a son or a
daughter or even more, by her or by any other wife, or even grand-children of
his own, then their presence reduces her share to one eighth. Again settlement
of debts and execution of a will take precedence over sharing out the property.
The share given to a wife remains the same whether the deceased husband leaves
behind one wife or two or three or four. All of them share equally in that
portion of one quarter or one-eighth as the case may be.
The
final role in the second verse outlining the system of inheritance is concerned
with a person who leaves no heirs in the direct line.
"If
the man or woman whose inheritance is in question, has left neither ascendants
or descendants, but has left a brother or a sister, each one of the two gets a
sixth; but if more than two, they share in a third after payment of legacies and
debts; so that no loss is caused (to anyone). Thus is it ordained by God; and
God is All-knowing, Most forbearing". (IV : 12)
This
is the case of a person having heirs whose relationship to him is weaker than
that of parents and children. Abu-Bakr (the first of the rightly guided Caliphs)
was asked to define the Arabic term KALALAH which is used in the Qur'an to refer
to such a person. He said "I can give only my ownview. If it is correct,
then I am right only by Allah's grace. If it is mistaken, the mistake is mine
and caused by Satan. Allah and His messenger are not party to it. KALALAH
is a person who has no children and no parents". When Umar (the
second rightly guided Caliph) took over, he said in this connection, "I
would be ashamed to contradict Abu-Bakr in an opinion of his".
In
fact the most eminent scholars among the companions of the Prophet (PBUH) and
those in the next generation and founders of all four major schools of thought
and the overwhelming majority of scholars in successive generations subscribe to
this definition.
"If
a man or a woman has neither ascendants or descendants, but has left a brother
or a sister, each one of the two gets a sixth".
What
is meant by the deceased having a brother or a sister in this verse is that
either of them is only half a brother or half a sister on the mother's side. If
they are a full brother or a full sister, or if they are half a brother or half
a sister on his father's side, they inherit according to the last verse in this
Surah which gives them a portion in which a male takes twice as much as a
female. The portion mentioned here of one-sixth to either of them, boy or girl
applies only to half brothers and sisters on the side of the deceased mother.
They
have an apportioned share which is specified in the Qur'an. They do not inherit
on the basis of being the nearest of kin. Had that been the case, they would
have taken all the deceased's estate, or what is left of it, after those who
have apportioned shares have taken theirs.
"But
if more than two, they share in a third". This applies regardless of their
number or their sex. The weightier opinion is that they share out equally their
total portion of one third although some scholars maintain that the division of
the portion must be on the basis of a male taking twice as much as a female.
Equal division seems to be the weightier because it is in line with the
principle stated in the same verse, giving the male an equal share of the
female. "Each of the two gets a sixth".
This
means that half brothers and half sisters on the mother's side are different
from other heirs on three counts:
i)
The share of males and females are equal among them,
ii)
They have no claim to any part of the inheritance unless the deceased has
no parents. If he is survived by his father, grand-father, child or grandchild,
they inherit nothing,
iii)
Their total share regardless of their numbers has a maximum of one-third
of the estate.
"After
payment of legacies and debts, so that no loss is caused (to anyone)". This
is a warning against making a will for specific purpose of harming any of one's
heirs, thus Islam ensures that a will is made to serve justice and the family's
interest. It is worth mentioning again here that settling debts takes precedence
of executing the will and both the debt and the will take precedence over
sharing out the inheritance among heirs.
This
second verse is concluded with a comment which is similar to that of the first
(IV : II). "Thus it is ordained by God; and God is All-knowing, most
forbearing". Thus the import of this comment is much strongly emphasized.
These apportioned shares are given as a commandment from God. They are not the
result of any caprice, nor are they swayed by desire. They ****** from perfect
knowledge. Hence, they must be obeyed because they are made by the one to whom
the right to legislate and apportion totally belongs. They must be accepted
because they come from the only source with absolute and perfect knowledge.
*****************
(BOOK 6)****************
back to top
Question:
If
a person who has a father passes away leaving children. Does the death of the
children father deprive those young children of the inheritance which their
father would have received, had his father died before him ?
Answer:
If
the uncle (or any) in this case contests the claim of the children to inherit
from their grandfather in place of their deceased father, it is his (or any
other) right to do so from the legal point of view. The share of the deceased
man in his father's estate is not passed on to his children. There can be no
inheritance claimed on future events. The grandfather of the children, however,
is free to bequeath to them by will an amount of money which may be equivalent
to their father's share or may exceed it provided that it does not go above
one-third of his total estate. If he does not take that step to bequeath them
anything, they are left with nothing.
In
order to safe-guard the interests of the grand children a number of Muslim
countries have incorporated in their family laws the principle of
"COMPULSORY WILL" advocated by IMAM IBN HAZM, who was a great scholar
and an Imam in his own right.
This
principle states that for the grandfather to bequeath the children in this case
by will is not a matter of choice. It is compulsory, whether the grandfather
actually makes a will in favor of his grand children after the death of their
father or not, such a will is assumed to exist. It gives the children the lesser
of the two amounts, the share of their deceased father had he survived his own
father, or one third of the estate of their grandfather. This provides an
equitable solution for all.
While
the uncle (or any relative) of the children may be acting strictly within the
law, he is not acting humanly. He is better advised to look at his nephews (or
the children) as he looks on his won children. Who knows that his own children
may be in the same position, if he were to die before his own father.
back to top
Question:
Can
one dispute inheritance on the basis of local laws and traditions, which differ
from Allah's law ?
Answer:
People
can choose whether they want to conduct their affairs according to the law of
Islam, or to some other law, be it local tradition, custom or any other form of
man made law. If they opt for tradition and human law, they cannot claim to be
Muslims. It is not sufficient for a person to declare that he believes in the
oneness of Allah and the message of Mohammad (PBUH) without giving practical
effect to that declaration. The practical effect can only take the shape of
abiding by Allah's law and implementing it whenever and wherever it lies in his
power to implement it. Let us suppose that in a case of inheritance, the matter
is put to a court of law in an Un-Islamic society and the verdict of the court
gives a certain person a much larger share than that to which he is entitled
under the Islamic law of inheritance. Does this judgement make it lawful for his
to take the extra share ? The answer is decidedly in the negative. What he has
to do is to go to the other heirs who receive, under the court judgement less
than their rightful shares and give them all the extra share he has received
over and above that to which he is entitled under, Islamic law. The Prophet
(PBUH) tells us in very clear terms that this is what we must do. He says
"you come to me for judgement and some of you may be more eloquent in
putting their case than others. I am only a human being. If by my judgement I
give a verdict in their favor. They may have certain documents, or they may
conceal other documents. The other party in the dispute may not be able to put
his case properly for a variety of reason. No judge can always know the rights
and wrongs in every case put to him. He has to base his judgement on the
evidence presented to him. This means that he is liable to make errors because
the evidence may not be complete or may be put to him unfairly. The parties to
the case should know their rights as they are. If one of them feels that he has
been given a judgement which allows him more than his right, then to take what
exceeds his right is to take a brand of fire in his hand. He will not escape the
fair judgement of Allah.
It
some countries such as Pakistan, Syria, Egypt and parts of the Arab World some
local customs of inheritance are practiced which do not conform with Islamic
law, for example, women are not given any share of the inheritance. The whole
idea seems to be borne by the great value peasants, farmers and land-lords
attach to their land. They want to keep it within their own family, and do not
wish any part of it to go to other families through the marriage of their
daughters. You will hear people say that if they allowed their daughters a share
of their inheritance, theirs land would go to strangers. They forget that in
Islam, a woman is entitled to all rights of ownership and to the right of
looking after what she owns and to invest her money and exploit her land as she
desires. Her husband cannot dictate to her in any of these aspects. Hence, when
a woman inherits part of her father's property, she enjoys a better position in
respect to her husband's family. No one may be grudge her rights. There are
numerous cases where families would have been saved from ruin if only the woman
had some property of her own. How many times a father is incapacitated by
illness or dies leaving behind a widow who may still be in the prime of her life
and has very young children. If she has property of her own, she would be able
to look after her children well. If she is deprived of her inheritance, she and
her children may face a very bleak prospect.
The
overriding point, however, is that Allah's law should be implemented. People
will be rewarded when they abide by it. They will gain instead a much greater
reward. They will gain the reward which Allah will give to them for willingly
abiding by His law. He will bless them and their children and their property for
that.
back to top
Question:
If
a man gifts to any of his children or to his wife, does it effect their share of
inheritance when he dies?
Answer:
It
is open to a Muslim man to spend his money for whatever purpose he wishes
provided that he does not contravene the teachings of Islam and he does not
cause any injustice to anyone who has a claim on him. It is permissible for a
man therefore, to buy a house or a
plot of land or a car or anything of like nature and present it to his wife or
his child, provided that in doing so he does not unjustly treat another wife of
his or his other children. What this means in effect is that if he has more than
one wife, he should not exceed the limits of fair and equal treatment of his
wives. If he has more than one child, he should treat all of them equally.
If
the man gives such a present in order to evade the claim of any of his other
heirs, such as his other wife or other children, then he is doing something
which is unacceptable.
If
there is no element of injustice in the whole affair, a person who is of sound
physical and mental health may dispose his money as he likes. There will be no
effect of any gift made in this way on the shares of inheritance because the
case of inheritance does not arise until the man dies. Before his death, his
money is his to dispose of as he likes, and none of his heirs has any claim to
his particular share. The only claim is that of supporting his dependants, which
include his wife, young children or parents who do not have an income of their
own, or unwed sisters and young brothers of their parents are died and cannot
support themselves.
If
a person makes such gifts in his will, he must be careful, we are not allowed to
bequeath by will to our rightful heirs. If we want to do that, we can only give
them what they will be entitled to have according to the rules of inheritance
which are very specific in Islam. It is useful to mention that a person is
allowed to leave by will up to one third of his wealth provided that he does not
give any of his heirs any added share. This is due to the Hadith which states
categorically "No heir may be given anything by will".
back to top
Question:
Who
are unlawful co-sharers of inheritance ?
Answer:
The
answer is simplified as under:
i)
One who has murdered his predecessor willingly or unwillingly is not
entitled to a share in inheritance. (Reported by Abu Huraira and quoted by
Tirmidhi),
ii)
Those who have different religion, cannot become lawful heirs of the
deceased. (Reported by Usama bin Zaid and agreed upon by all) and Similarly the
people of two different religion shall not inherit from one another (quoted by
Ibn Majah). Though it is valid for one to bequeath to one of another religion
from the maximum of one-third allowed for willingly by an individual.
iii)
A fugitive slave who has fled away from his master cannot inherit the
property of deceased.
iv)
The bastard (illegitimate) child shall not inherit nor be inherited.
(Reported by Amr bin Shuaib and quoted by Tirmidhi).
v)
Adopted children cannot inherit.
back to top
Question:
Is
it allowed for one to disinherit one's legal heirs?
Answer:
It is certainly forbidden for one to either disinherit one's legal heirs
or to arrange in a manner prior to his death, that the legal heirs do not
inherit or to try and deprive the children of their rights of inheritance. We
can appreciate this letter when we remember that according to Islam
we do not "OWN" our money, we are simply put "incharge"
of it. When we die, it goes beck to Allah, its owner, who distributes it to our
heirs, according to the shares He has appointed for everyone of them. It is not
permissible for anyone to try to evade this system set up by Allah in order to
deprive any of his heirs of his or her rightful share.
If
gifts are made during one's life time with the intention of evading the natural
laws of succession, it becomes very difficult for heirs to fight this in a court
of law. A judge will only rule on the basis of evidence, and if gifts and
presents are made with the necessary documentation, and this satisfies all legal
requirements, he cannot ignore it and decide in its favor.
back to top
|